Once the Scientist has Spoken…
all the thinking has been done, apparently.
Slashdot.org is whining:
The good news is that the board dropped a 20-year-old requirement that both “strengths and weaknesses” of all scientific theories be taught; score one for the teaching of evolution.
…
The not-so-good news is that in a “compromise,” the board also voted to require that students “in all fields of science, analyze, evaluate and critique scientific explanations… including examining all sides of scientific evidence of those scientific explanations, so as to encourage critical thinking by the student.” Score one for the Discovery Institute.
Apparently it’s a win for evolution when you just ignore the large gapping holes in the theory. The teaching of evolution has gotten so ridiculous that to the true believers the theory of evolution is on par with the theory of gravity. There is also no longer a distinction between “micro” and “macro” evolution and the education on that has gotten so bad that people actually think those two terms were created by a creationist as some sort of attack of evolution.
The “compromise” is to stop poking the evolutionists by running Mac Trucks through the theory and allowing them to pick the strengths. So basically the text book author goes to an Evolutionist and says “hey, what’s a good proof of evolution?” And the evolutionist says “Dinosaurs.” The text book author is then free to point out that Dinosaurs do nothing to prove the theory of evolution. As long as evolutionists pick the topics, the authors can have at it.
Evolution is the only scientific theory I’m aware of where it’s a “win” when you can’t criticize it. There are plenty of cults were that is true and it’s rather odd to find that attitude when the core beliefs of the group relate to something other than religious doctrines.
