Silly Arguments

Every once in awhile I venture into anti-religion territory

From Religious Freaks

“Ok, let’s go down this route and assume that there is a “designer”. Then this designer must be a complex and intelligent being. Well Harold just stated that anything complex must have a designer. So by his own logic, who the hell designed the designer? Well obviously something intelligent. But who designed that designer? It can go on indefinitely. This theory lacks any form of substance and relies on the ignorance of humanity.”

It could. But it stops at God. God is eternal, uncreated. Where did this highly complex singularity come from that the Big Bang relies on?

I’ve seen this argument before. With the Matrix no less. People were bitching that the final Matrix introduced a third plane of existance. They were fine with 2 but when the third was introduced they decided that there must be an infinite number of planes. I see. So you can deal with 2 planes of existance but any more than two is proof of infinity. No, there are exactly three. There could be more but there’s no indication of that from the movies. There was the fake world that man created the world that man lives in and the world that man goes to. Kind of like the world we live in.

In this same way, God is the uncreated creator. Everything else must be created. Real mind bending stuff. Even in the Big Bang theory something is eternal, uncreated. They claim it was a singularity. Religious people call it God.

It’s this lack of stopping skills that led to the fairy tale of evolution to begin with. Charles Darwin saw a duck in the middle of the road and assumed it must have traveled millions of years and started as a single cell to get there. Meanwhile, it had just wandered from the farm close by.

Nobody disputes that things change. The dispute is simply over the starting point.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

ss_blog_claim=70b9168863fc97c91e6d88b40542a327 ss_blog_claim=70b9168863fc97c91e6d88b40542a327